I am pretty tolerant about things, in general. I am a big supporter of gay marriage, equal rights, etc. I am also not a fan of current gender roles, gender definitions, and such. I am queer in the sense that I do not accept the stereotypical gender roles, and I see a great deal of overlap. Plus, I think that a lot of the gender roles are really just people trying to fit into what they think their gender should be, rather than doing something that they honestly feel is right. I am straight, and while I sometimes wish I were bisexual, I have no problems being a tolerant straight guy. Some of the things I do, such as cry when I hike up an amazing mountain, or cry when I listen to a sad and beautiful song, might be considered effeminate or "gay" by many. But many other things that I do would not at all be considered gay. And when it comes down to it, I do seek deep, intimate bonds with males, but I do not seek sexual ones, and I seek intimate bonds that would be considered extremely good friendship, rather than lovers. It is love, of a different sort. I would have no problem cuddling with a guy, but still, not the same sort of loving relationship that I seek with someone of the opposite sex. I still want to be able to run home and tell a certain male friend of mine, who happens to run this site, my feelings and such, but not so much as I would love to do that with a girlfriend.
I say all this so that you do not think me a monster for saying the rest of this.
As much as I support homosexuality, transgenderedness, etc., for some odd reason, deep down inside of me, I never thought that a homosexual relationship could be as loving as a heterosexual one. I had always thought that a homosexual relationship was about as strong as my relationship with my bestest of friends, and anything more than that was posing, to look like what the standard societal view of "normal" is. I suppose I thought this because I could not possibly feel the same level of bonding with a male friend as I felt with my girlfriend when we were going out. That is because for me, an extremely good friend is the highest level of lovingness that a guy can ever get with me, because that is just the way that I am. But fortunately, my eyes have been opened, and having for the first time witnessed true homosexual love, I can see that it is just as true and real and beautiful as any heterosexual love.
I see this because for the last week, and until tomorrow, my housemate's fiance is over. They are a cute lesbian couple. Very cute! They are infatuated with each other! They were playing the piano earlier, and one was teaching the other how to play. They kiss and cuddle just like any male/female combination would. It is clear that they are deeply in love, and I think that they will make for a great wife and wife when they get married. My eyes have been opened because this is the first time I have really been able to witness a true homosexual relationship in private life. Everyone acts differently in public life, whether a homo or hetero couple. Even a polygamous relationship is very different in public than in the house. I am glad that I have seen this. It has been a nice week.
Now to continue the battle to get rid of the stereotypical ideas of homosexuality! One thing that I have noticed for a while, even from people like my own mother (who supports homosexuality and homosexual marriage), is that a lot of people think that the stereotypical gay guy will act like the stereotypical straight female, and the stereotypical gay female will act like the stereotypical straight male (but in a different way from being transgendered. Not sure if you see what I mean, but hopefully you do). Sure, my housemate has some stereotypical lesbian traits. She has short hair, likes tools a great deal, etc. But she also has a lot of qualities that are considered very feminine, in our stereotypicalized, gender-divided society. Her fiance, on the other hand, seems very much like a stereotypical straight girl. At least at first glance. This is an issue that goes so much deeper than this post, or this issue, or even the gender debate. There is so much overlap, and individuality, with all people, no matter what aspect of humanity you are looking at. It would be nice if one day we were able to drop the word "stereotypical" from our vocabularies, because everyone would recognize the beauty and individuality of everyone, and not try and fit every individual into a pigeon-hole of what they should be, based on a couple of their traits or their background or their life experiences, or whatever.



cool :)
Thanks for posting your story. It is quite cool/interesting and heartwarming! :) And it also illustrates some profound points...
1. The difference between supporting queerness and emotionally accepting queerness. I have heard some people say, after hearing that someone they know is queer, that they are intellectually accepting but not totally emotionally accepting. They know they should be accepting and fully supportive but something emotionally still holds them back. The Simpsons episode where Springfield legalized gay money (I mean marriage) illustrates this conflict in Marge (who is totally supportive of same-sex marriage, and totally supportive of gay rights, but still has trouble accepting her sister as gay). Why is this? I'm not sure exactly -- but I can relate. For me, the intellectual realization usually comes before the emotional realization. I'm sure this varies from person to person.
2. We see the world through our own understanding/biases (as you said) -- and sometimes it's hard to get over this. If I cannot personally understand how a same-sex couple can be as deeply loving as a opposite-sex couple, then I might not believe it's even possible. And the messages we're given in mainstream culture/media/public don't help our understanding much. Popular shows (i.e., Will and Grace) play on stereotypes and don't show a deep intimate loving relationship between individuals of the same sex (I guess it's a sitcom, they don't really show it between anyone?) . Other shows depicting homosexual relationships seem to focus a lot on sex. So this may illustrate the importance of building such positive messages into popular culture (that help with understanding homosexual and other relationships as very intimate/loving). (With that said, we have to be careful not to present only one style of valid relationship -- i.e., we cannot posit that an intimate relationship is only valid if it is intimate/loving in the way that the stereotypical heterosexual relationship is intimate/loving. But /that/ an alternative relationship can be intimate/loving would be a positive message.)
3. The incredible impact that language has on our consciousness/reality. For example, female implies feminine implies attracted to males, enjoys shopping and decorating and such. Male implies masculine implies attracted to female, enjoys power tools and fast cars. So in language (male/masculine, female/feminine) we have really strong links between more essential characteristics of an individual (biologically male or female) to less (or non-) essential characteristics (masculine, feminine, etc). When some part of this link is broken (i.e., a female attracted to a female), then immediately other characteristics from maleness are adopted in our consciousness (in order to preserve the link as much as possible?). Anyway, there is a lot of theory out there dealing with this sort of thing and I don't claim to understand it entirely ;).
Hope this makes sense ;)
mekyla.